NHS England has for the first time, published its Medium-Term Planning Framework (MTPF) for 2026/27 to 2028/29. This is not another short-term policy document. It’s a welcome move away from annual planning cycles.
For pharma, medtech, and NHS leaders, this framework provides a three-year line of sight. It sets out the financial terms, operational priorities, and strategic direction the health service must take. Understanding its implications is essential for planning and partnership.
The MTPF’s primary function is to create stability. By moving to a multi-year framework, NHS England provides Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) and provider trusts with the headroom to plan beyond the immediate financial year.
This stability is welcome, but it comes with expectations. The framework is the implementation plan for existing national strategies, including the 10-Year Health Plan and the Life Sciences Sector Plan.
Beyond the headline recovery targets, the framework contains specific, impactful initiatives for industry.
The push for digital is no longer just an ambition; it is a core operational mandate. The plan accelerates the adoption of specific technologies to manage demand and improve productivity.
The framework's focus on efficiency, pathway standardisation, and prevention creates direct challenges and opportunities.
No big surprises as the MTPF is an exercise in execution, rather than a new strategic direction. It takes existing policies established in the ‘Fit for the future’ 10-year plan and attaches firm targets, financial levers, and timelines to them. It takes existing policies established in the ‘Fit for the future’ 10-year plan and attaches firm targets, financial levers, and timelines to them.
However, there are points of tension. The NHS Confederation highlights potential "mixed messages" in the framework’s desire to devolve power to local systems while simultaneously being highly prescriptive on national targets.
For some, the plan also has "striking omissions." The Centre for Mental Health, for example, notes that despite being a priority, the framework lacks new funding commitments or access standards for mental health services, falling short of the ambition needed.
The MTPF solidifies the trends of recent years. Future partnerships between industry and the NHS must be built on a new understanding of NHS priorities.
The 2026/27 Medium-Term Planning Framework provides the NHS with a welcome, if challenging, period of stability. It ends short-term planning and focuses the entire system on three goals: elective recovery, financial balance, and productivity.
For the pharmaceutical and medtech industries, the demand is for technology that is integrated by default, not as an add-on. The value proposition must focus on efficiency. And the partnership model must shift to support ICSs and neighbourhood teams in managing population health and moving care out of the hospital. The introduction of a Single National Formulary and new Modern Service Frameworks will be defining developments for the pharmaceutical market over this period. This strategic direction will soon be followed by financial detail; Sir Jim Mackey confirmed at the recent King's Fund conference that the associated funding rule changes for the next three years are expected to be published later this month.
Explore our latest thinking, event updates and industry insights to stay informed.

After the breakdown of VPAG negotiations, ABPI & the government agree an extension for VPAG 2026 deadline and an overhaul of NICE’s medicine valuation formula.
%20(1).jpg)
Wes Streeting announces £10 million rollout of 43 neighbourhood health services across England. Find out what it means for pharma, medtech and the NHS.
.png)
Analysing the Life Sciences Sector Plan’s core pillars and the practical implications for organisations in pharmaceuticals, medtech, and NHS & their workforce.